Adminstrative Committee, Google LLC Welfare Benefit Plan v. Berryman et al, No. 5:22-cv-03154 (N.D. Cal.) $GOOGL
Complaint
Dkt #1
Filed on May 31, 2022
8 pages
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17220238.). Filed byAdminstrative Committee, Google LLC Welfare Benefit Plan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Plan Language, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Harutyunyan, Shahane) (Filed on 5/31/2022) (Entered: 05/31/2022)
This free document is provided by PacerDash, a real-time source for millions of federal court filings. Learn more.
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 1 of 8
1 SHAHANE HARUTYUNYAN, ESQ. (SBN 311736)
2
KOLB CLARE & ARNOLD, PSC
9400 Williamsburg Plaza, Suite 200
3 Louisville, KY 40222
4 (818) 794-0399
(844) 557-4329 Facsimile
5 sharut@kcalegal.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
Administrative Committee, Google LLC Welfare Benefit Plan
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE,
12 GOOGLE LLC WELFARE BENEFIT
13
PLAN CIVIL ACTION
FILE NO. 5:22-CV-3154
14 Plaintiff,
15 vs.
COMPLAINT
16 BORIS E. EFRON, A
17 PROFESSIONAL LAW
CORPORATION and ORNA
18
BERRYMAN
19 Defendants.
20
21
Plaintiff, Administrative Committee, Google LLC Welfare Benefit Plan, by
22
23 and through undersigned counsel, and for its Complaint against the Defendants,
24
states and alleges as follows:
25
26 ///
27 ///
28
COMPLAINT
-1-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 2 of 8
1 NATURE OF ACTION, PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2
1. This is an action for equitable relief to enforce the terms and preserve the
3
4 assets of an employee welfare benefit plan under the terms of the Employee
5 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §1000-1461.
6
2. Plaintiff is a fiduciary of the Google LLC Welfare Benefit Plan (hereinafter
7
8 “Google Plan”). The Google Plan is a self-funded employee welfare benefit plan.
9
Plaintiff is authorized to bring this action on behalf of all Google Plan participants
10
11 to enforce the terms of the Plan and to protect the assets of the Plan under 29 U.S.C.
12 §1132(a)(3) and federal common law.
13
3. This is an action for the imposition of an equitable lien by agreement over
14
15 identifiable funds in the possession and/or control of the Defendants. No money
16
damages are being sought from the Defendants in this matter.
17
18
4. Defendant, Orna Berryman, is a resident of California and may be personally
19 served at her residence at 1419 Rosalia Avenue, San Jose, California 95130.
20
5. Defendant, Boris E. Efron, A Professional Law Corporation is located in
21
22 California, and may be served at 130 Portola Road, Portola Valley, California
23
94028.
24
6. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 as this
25
26 is an action to enforce the terms of an employee welfare benefit plan under ERISA
27
and federal common law.
28
COMPLAINT
-2-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 3 of 8
1 7. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(e)(2) venue is proper in this Court because the
2
Google Plan is administered in this district.
3
4 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5
6 8. July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, Berryman was a beneficiary of the
7
Google Plan by virtue of her husband Bill Berryman’s employment with Google.
8
9. January 1, 2019 through October 1, 2019, Berryman was a participant and
9
10 beneficiary of the Google Plan by virtue of her own employment with Google.
11
10. On or about July 2, 2018, Berryman sustained injuries in a white water rafting
12
13 incident.
14 11. The Google Plan paid medical benefits in the amount of $123,140.27 for
15
treatment of injuries that Berryman incurred from the rafting incident.
16
17 12. The Google Plan contains an express provision which provides for the Plan’s
18
right to first reimbursement out of any recovery from another party, without
19
20 reduction for attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses or damages claimed by the covered
21 person, and regardless of whether the covered person is made whole or recovers only
22
part of his/her damages. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of
23
24 the applicable provision of the Google Plan for claims incurred, which are
25
incorporated by reference.
26
27 ///
28
COMPLAINT
-3-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 4 of 8
1 13. Berryman hired Boris E. Efron, A Professional Law Corporation (hereinafter
2
“Efron PLC”) to pursue claims arising out of the white water rafting accident.
3
4 14. Berryman settled her injury claims against the white water rafting company
5 for a total sum of $500,000.
6
15. Berryman and Efron PLC have failed to reimburse the Google Plan the
7
8 amount owed from the proceeds of the white water rafting settlement; and have
9
thereby breached the terms of the Google Plan.
10
11 16. The Google Plan has not consented to the distribution of any portion of the
12 white water rafting settlement to Berryman or any other party or parties.
13
17. Upon information and belief, a portion of the settlement funds were
14
15 distributed directly to Berryman contrary to the express provisions of the Google
16
Plan.
17
18
18. Upon information and belief, Efron PLC is holding some amount of the
19 settlement proceeds from Berryman’s settlement in trust.
20
21 COUNT I: EQUITABLE LIEN ON SETTLEMENT
22 PROCEEDS PAID TO ORNA BERRYMAN
23 19. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations set
24
forth in paragraphs 1 through 18 above.
25
26 20. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), Plaintiff seeks equitable relief against
27 Berryman to enforce the written terms of the Google Plan.
28
COMPLAINT
-4-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 5 of 8
1 21. Berryman is in actual or constructive possession of settlement funds, or assets
2
acquired with the settlement funds, and is therefore in possession of funds or assets
3
4 that as a matter of equity and good conscience belong to the Google Plan.
5 22. Berryman was on notice of the Google Plan’s rights pursuant to the written
6
terms of the Google Plan.
7
8 23. Berryman has refused to turn over the settlement funds according to the
9
written provisions of the Google Plan. The Google Plan is entitled to an equitable
10
11 lien by agreement on the settlement funds, or any assets acquired with such funds,
12 held in Berryman’s actual or constructive possession.
13
24. Berryman should be ordered to turn over to the Google Plan any settlement
14
15 funds in her actual or constructive possession (up to the amount of benefits advanced
16
by the Plan on her behalf) in order to enforce the written terms of the Google Plan.
17
18
25. This Court should impose an equitable lien by agreement in favor of the
19 Google Plan on any of the settlement funds or on any assets obtained with the
20
settlement funds that is in Berryman’s actual or constructive possession.
21
22 COUNT II: EQUITABLE LIEN ON SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS HELD BY
BORIS E. EFRON, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
23
24
26. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations set
25
26 forth in Paragraphs 1 through 25 above.
27
28
COMPLAINT
-5-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 6 of 8
1 27. Upon information and belief, the settlement proceeds from the resolution of
2
Berryman’s claims were deposited into the Efron PLC trust account.
3
4 28. Upon information and belief, a portion of the settlement remains in the Efron
5 PLC trust account.
6
29. Despite actual notice of the Google Plan’s lien, employees or members of
7
8 Efron PLC distributed a portion of the settlement proceeds allocated to Berryman’s
9
injury claims to Berryman in violation of the Google Plan’s lien.
10
11 30. Upon information and belief, Efron PLC is in possession of funds that in
12 equity and good conscience belong to the Google Plan.
13
31. Efron PLC has refused to turn over the settlement funds according to the
14
15 written provisions of the Google Plan.
16
32. Efron PLC should be ordered to turn over to the Google Plan any proceeds of
17
18
the settlement of Berryman’s injury claims being held in its trust account.
19 COUNT III: ATTORNEY FEES (AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS)
20
33. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations set
21
22 forth in Paragraphs 1 through 32 above.
23
34. Plaintiff seeks its actual attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §
24
1132(g).
25
26 PRAYER FOR RELIEF
27
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff seeks the following relief:
28
COMPLAINT
-6-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 7 of 8
1 a. For service upon the Defendants as required by law;
2
b. An order imposing an equitable lien by agreement in favor of the
3
4 Plaintiff upon the settlements proceeds in possession of each
5 Defendant and requiring Defendants, as constructive trustee, to
6
transfer the funds to the Plaintiff;
7
8 c. An order imposing an equitable lien on any assets that Defendants
9
acquired, in whole or in part, with the proceeds of Defendant, Orna
10
11 Berryman’s settlement;
12 d. An order enjoining Defendants from transferring or disposing of the
13
settlements funds which would prejudice, frustrate, or impair
14
15 Plaintiff’s ability to recover same;
16
e. An order awarding reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred
17
18
herein, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1); and
19 f. Other and further equitable relief to which the Plaintiff may be
20
entitled.
21
22
23
May 27, 2022 KOLB CLARE & ARNOLD, PSC
24
25 By: /s/ Shahane Harutyunyan
Shahane Harutyunyan
26
Kolb Clare & Arnold, PSC
27 9400 Williamsburg Plaza, Suite 200
28 Louisville, KY 40222
COMPLAINT
-7-
Case 5:22-cv-03154 Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 8 of 8
1 (818) 794-0399
2
(844) 557-4329 Facsimile
sharut@kcalegal.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT
-8-
Last updated: Jun 14, 2022 00:05am EDT