Subscribe Now for Instant Access
View the full docket, download filings, and get automated alerts for new case activity.
Explore Plans
Smith et al v. FedEx Corporation et al, No. 3:05-cv-00600 (N.D. Ind.)
Case Title: Smith et al v. FedEx Corporation et al
Case Type: Civil Case
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Index Number(s): 3:2005cv600, 3:05-cv-00600, 3:05-cv-00600-RLM-MGG
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Judge: Robert L Miller, Jr
Magistrate Judge: Michael G Gotsch, Sr
Case Opened: September 20, 2005
Case Closed December 15, 2010
Docket Entries
Date Filed Dkt # Entry Text
Sep 27, 2005 4 OPINION AND ORDER denying any pending motion to stay and/or motion for enlargement of time in anticipation of the upcoming scheduling conference. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 9/27/05. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RL M-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00536-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00538-RLM-CAN,3: 05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00593-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Document
Dec 20, 2005 13 OPINION AND ORDER : On December 9, 2005 the court gave notice to the parties of its proposal to close 3:05cv720 as an identical case to 3:05cv668. Ten days has passed without objection so the court now orders 3:05cv720 closed. This order has no impa ct on the legal rights of any party involved.. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 12/20/05. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM-CAN,3:05 -cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00536-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00538-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-0059 3-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00652-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00653-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00664-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00665-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00666-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00667-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00668-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00720-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Document
Sep 6, 2006 27 OPINION AND ORDER denying 306 Motion to Compel . Signed by Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 9/6/06. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM -CAN,3:05-cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00538-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00593-RLM-CAN,3:0 5-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00652-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00664-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00666-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00667-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00668-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00720-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00796-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00209-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00269-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00337-RLM,3:06-cv-00393-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00428-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00429-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Document
Dec 14, 2006 43 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's objection to the Magistrate Judge's ruling 369 is SUSTAINED IN PART and the Defendants' motion to compel 306 is GRANTED IN PART.. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 12/14/06. Associated Cases: 3: 05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00 538-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00593-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM- CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00652-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00664-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00666-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00667-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00668-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00720-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00796-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00209-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00269-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00337-RLM,3:06-cv-00393-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00428-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00429-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00801-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00802-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Document
Jul 11, 2008 132 OPINION AND ORDER granting (1151) Motion for Reconsideration re: the Court's 1119 Order of 3/25/08 and DENYING Tennessee plaintiffs' 599 Motion for Class Certification under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act in case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 7/11/08. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN, 3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN(ksc)
Document
Feb 17, 2010 168 ORDER granting (1699) Motion to Certify Class to the Tennessee plaintiffs as set forth in the court's 3/25/08 order 1119 . Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 2/17/10. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN, 3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN(sdf)
Document
May 1, 2017 227 OPINION AND ORDER: The court OVERRULES Kevin Pattersons objection to the proposed settlement in 3:05cv600, Doc. 218 ; GRANTS IN PART the plaintiffs unopposed 2883 motion for final approval of the Tennessee class action settlement calling for payme nt of $12,250,000 to the plaintiffs; GRANTS IN PART the plaintiffs 2827 motion for attorneys fees and costs; and DISMISSES with prejudice this action, with each party to bear its own costs andattorneys fees, except as provided in the order. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 5/1/2017. (dk)
Document
May 7, 2018 236 Main Document
MDL Order (BLUE)
Apr 26, 2019 237 Main Document
Objection

This is a partial docket sheet. Subscribers can access the full docket and download PDF filings.

Subscribe now for instant access

PACER Links

PacerDash lets you track and monitor dockes without the complexity and cost of accessing PACER directly. If you have an existing PACER subscription you can access this docket using the U.S. Court's CM/ECF system.

Access this docket on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system

News Links

Search for this case: Smith et al v. FedEx Corporation et al, No. 3:05-cv-00600 (N.D. Ind.)

[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]

© PacerMonkey LLC Legal