Subscribe Now for Instant Access
View the full docket, download filings, and get automated alerts for new case activity.
Explore Plans
In re Molycorp. Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 1:13-cv-05697 (S.D.N.Y.)
Case Title: In re Molycorp. Inc. Securities Litigation
Case Type: Civil Case
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Index Number(s): 1:2013cv5697, 1:13-cv-05697, 1:13-cv-05697-PAC
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities/Commodities
Judge: Paul A. Crotty
Case Opened: August 14, 2013
Case Closed May 15, 2017
Docket Entries
Date Filed Dkt # Entry Text
Aug 14, 2013 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael F. Doolan, Kevin W. Johnson, Constantine E. Karayannopoulos, Molycorp, Inc., Mark A. Smith. (laq)
Document
Aug 14, 2013 Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. (laq)
Document
Aug 14, 2013 Case Designated ECF. (laq)
Document
Aug 14, 2013 1 COMPLAINT against Michael F. Doolan, Kevin W. Johnson, Constantine E. Karayannopoulos, Molycorp, Inc., Mark A. Smith. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 1074415)Document filed by Macie J. Jurkowski.(laq) (jd). (Entered: 08/19/2013)
Document
Aug 14, 2013 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (laq) (Entered: 08/19/2013)
Document
Sep 16, 2013 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert F. Serio on behalf of Molycorp, Inc.. (Serio, Robert) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
Document
Sep 16, 2013 4 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Molycorp, Inc..(Serio, Robert) Modified on 9/17/2013 (lb). (Entered: 09/16/2013)
Document
Sep 16, 2013 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gabrielle Frances Levin on behalf of Molycorp, Inc.. (Levin, Gabrielle) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
Document
Sep 17, 2013 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Robert F. Serio to RE-FILE Document 4 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). (lb)
Document
Sep 17, 2013 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Molibdenos Y Metales S.A., Other Affiliate Morgan Stanley, Other Affiliate Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Inc. for Molycorp, Inc.. Document filed by Molycorp, Inc..(Serio, Robert) (Entered: 09/17/2013)
Document
Sep 25, 2013 7 STIPULATION AND ORDER: NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to Court approval, as follows: The undersigned counsel for Defendants hereby accepts service of the complaint on behalf of those Defendants that have not yet been served, without waiver of any of Defendants' rights, including the right to challenge jurisdiction and venue. The Action shall no longer be designated for inclusion in the Pilot Program. All deadlines presently outstanding in this Action, including deadlines set by Court Rule, are hereby vacated. Defendants shall not be required to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Within 45 days following entry of the Court's order appointing Lead Plaintiff, the designated Lead Plaintiff shall file a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, which shall be the operative complaint in this Action. Upon the filing of the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, the parties shall consult with each other and file a stipulation and proposed order establishing a schedule for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, including the schedule for briefing on any motions to dismiss. No response to the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint shall be due until a schedule has been stipulated and agreed, or otherwise set by the Court. This Stipulation is without prejudice to the parties hereto agreeing, subject to Court approval, to a further extension of time regarding any of the deadlines established herein if circumstances warrant. No previous requests for an extension have been made. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/25/2013) (rsh) (Entered: 09/25/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ira M. Press on behalf of Gary Armstrong, Ronald Simmers. (Press, Ira) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 9 MOTION to Appoint Gary Armstrong and Ronald Simmers to serve as lead plaintiff(s)., MOTION to Appoint Counsel., MOTION to Consolidate Cases 13-cv-5943, 13-cv-5697. Document filed by Gary Armstrong, Ronald Simmers. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Press, Ira) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 10 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 9 MOTION to Appoint Gary Armstrong and Ronald Simmers to serve as lead plaintiff(s). MOTION to Appoint Counsel. MOTION to Consolidate Cases 13-cv-5943, 13-cv-5697. MOTION to Appoint Gary Armstrong and Ronald Simmers to serve as lead plaintiff(s).. Document filed by Gary Armstrong, Ronald Simmers. (Press, Ira) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 11 DECLARATION of Ira M. Press in Support re: 9 MOTION to Appoint Gary Armstrong and Ronald Simmers to serve as lead plaintiff(s). MOTION to Appoint Counsel. MOTION to Consolidate Cases 13-cv-5943, 13-cv-5697. MOTION to Appoint Gary Armstrong and Ronald Simmers to serve as lead plaintiff(s).. Document filed by Gary Armstrong, Ronald Simmers. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Press, Ira) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.., MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff., MOTION to Consolidate Cases. Document filed by Peter Broglio. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kim, Phillip) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.. MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff. MOTION to Consolidate Cases.. Document filed by Peter Broglio. (Kim, Phillip) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 14 DECLARATION of Phillip Kim in Support re: 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.. MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff. MOTION to Consolidate Cases.. Document filed by Peter Broglio. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Kim, Phillip) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 15 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:13-cv-5697; 1:13-cv-5953., MOTION to Appoint John Sailer, Jr. as Lead Plaintiff., MOTION to Appoint Counsel Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP. Document filed by John Sailer, Jr.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lieberman, Jeremy) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document
Oct 15, 2013 16 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 15 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:13-cv-5697; 1:13-cv-5953. MOTION to Appoint John Sailer, Jr. as Lead Plaintiff. MOTION to Appoint Counsel Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP.. Document filed by John Sailer, Jr.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Press Release, # 2 Exhibit B, Certification, # 3 Exhibit C, Loss Chart, # 4 Exhibit D, Firm Resume)(Lieberman, Jeremy) (Entered: 10/15/2013)
Document

This is a partial docket sheet. Subscribers can access the full docket and download PDF filings.

Subscribe now for instant access

PACER Links

PacerDash lets you track and monitor dockes without the complexity and cost of accessing PACER directly. If you have an existing PACER subscription you can access this docket using the U.S. Court's CM/ECF system.

Access this docket on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system

News Links

Search for this case: In re Molycorp. Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 1:13-cv-05697 (S.D.N.Y.)

[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]

© PacerMonkey LLC Legal