Subscribe Now for Instant Access
View the full docket, download filings, and get automated alerts for new case activity.
Explore Plans
Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc v. Web Direct Brands Inc, No. 2:13-cv-06548 (C.D. Cal.)
Case Title: Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc v. Web Direct Brands Inc
Case Type: Civil Case
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Index Number(s): 2:2013cv6548, 2:13-cv-06548, 2:13-cv-06548-SJO-SH
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Judge: S. James Otero
Magistrate Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Case Opened: September 6, 2013
Case Closed December 13, 2013
Docket Entries
Date Filed Dkt # Entry Text
Sep 6, 2013 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Web Direct Brands Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc. (et) (mg). (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 6, 2013 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant Web Direct Brands Inc. (et) (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 6, 2013 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc. (et) (mg). (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 6, 2013 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc. (et) (mg). (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 6, 2013 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc. Related Case(s): Not Indicated. (et) (mg). (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 6, 2013 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc. (et) (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 6, 2013 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle. (et) (Entered: 09/09/2013)
Document
Sep 16, 2013 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (ec) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
Document
Sep 19, 2013 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc, upon Defendant Web Direct Brands Inc served on 9/12/2013, answer due 10/3/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Matthew Raab, Vice President in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Schwartz, Edward) (Entered: 09/19/2013)
Document
Sep 19, 2013 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Schwartz, Edward) (Entered: 09/19/2013)
Document
Sep 20, 2013 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJ DAP case from Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges CV13-06548 SJO (SHx). (at) (Entered: 09/20/2013)
Document
Sep 23, 2013 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) (Entered: 09/23/2013)
Document
Sep 23, 2013 13 NOTICE OF UNDER SEAL FILING PROCEDURES by Judge S. James Otero. Judge Otero is participating in the Central District of Californias Pilot Project for the Electronic Submission and Filing of Under Seal Documents. The Pilot Project applies to both civil and criminal cases.Parties shall make every effort to limit the number and volume of under seal filings. In most circumstances, parties should seek to file under seal only the specific exhibits or documents for which there is a valid basis for filing under seal.When seeking the Courts approval for an under seal filing, the submitting party shall electronically file an Ex Parte Application to Seal and proposed Order through the Courts CM/ECF System pursuant to Local Rule 5-4. The Ex Parte Application and proposed Order shall not contain the information the party seeks to file under seal. The party seeking permission to file under seal shall submit to the Courts generic chambers e-mail address (sjo_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov) PDF versions of the Ex Parte Application, proposed Order, Declaration in Support of Ex Parte Application stating the reason for the under seal filing, and the document(s) and/or exhibit(s) the party seeks to file under seal. The party shall also submit a Word or WordPerfect version of the proposed Order to the generic chambers e-mail address.Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the submitting party shall deliver a Mandatory Chambers Copy of the Ex Parte Application, proposed Order, Declaration in Support of Ex Parte Application, and the document(s) and/or exhibit(s) the party seeks to file under seal to the Courts courtesy copy box located outside chambers no later than 12:00 p.m. on the following business day.The Pilot Project for the Electronic Submission and filing of Under Seal Documents does not apply to in camera submissions. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/23/2013)
Document
Oct 2, 2013 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Web Direct Brands Inc answer now due 11/2/2013, filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc.(Schwartz, Edward) (Entered: 10/02/2013)
Document
Nov 4, 2013 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Web Direct Brands Inc answer now due 11/18/2013, re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant Web Direct Brands Inc.(Attorney Jill Sarnoff Riola added to party Web Direct Brands Inc(pty:dft))(Riola, Jill) (Entered: 11/04/2013)
Document
Nov 18, 2013 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case And, In The Alternative, Transfer filed by Defendant Web Direct Brands Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/13/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Riola, Jill) (Entered: 11/18/2013)
Document
Nov 20, 2013 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MOTION to Dismiss Case And, In The Alternative, Transfer 16 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties. Other: Please use the SEARCH option on the CM/ECF menu bar, put in a key word to limit search for correct available events. Correct event to be used is Notice: Certificat/Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (cch) (Entered: 11/20/2013)
Document
Dec 4, 2013 18 STIPULATION to Continue Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and, in the alternative, to Transfer from January 13, 2014 Re: MOTION to Dismiss Case And, In The Alternative, Transfer 16 filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Schwartz, Edward) (Entered: 12/04/2013)
Document
Dec 6, 2013 19 ORDER DENYING 18 the Stipulationto Continue Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and, in the alternative to Transfer by Judge S. James Otero. (lc) (Entered: 12/06/2013)
Document
Dec 10, 2013 20 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), With Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc.(Schwartz, Edward) (Entered: 12/10/2013)
Document

This is a partial docket sheet. Subscribers can access the full docket and download PDF filings.

Subscribe now for instant access

PACER Links

PacerDash lets you track and monitor dockes without the complexity and cost of accessing PACER directly. If you have an existing PACER subscription you can access this docket using the U.S. Court's CM/ECF system.

Access this docket on the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system

News Links

Search for this case: Guardian Pool Fence Systems Inc v. Web Direct Brands Inc, No. 2:13-cv-06548 (C.D. Cal.)

[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]

© PacerMonkey LLC Legal