Gennell Jr et al v. FedEx Corporation et al

No. 3:05-cv-00534, Indiana Northern District Court

Last updated: Mar 22, 2022 19:51pm EDT

Stock Tags
$FDX
Case Title
Gennell Jr et al v. FedEx Corporation et al
Docket Index Number
3:05-cv-00534
Date Opened
Aug 10, 2005
Date Closed
May 27, 2011
Case Type
Civil Case
Cause of Action
28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Nature of Suit
Contract: Other
Judge
Robert L Miller, Jr
Magistrate Judge
Christopher A Nuechterlein
Case Number
3:2005cv534
PACER Docket Link
Access Docket on PACER
(Separate PACER login required)

Docket Sheet

Dkt # 7
Sep 27, 2005
OPINION AND ORDER denying any pending motion to stay and/or motion for enlargement of time in anticipation of the upcoming scheduling conference. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 9/27/05. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RL M-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00536-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00538-RLM-CAN,3: 05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00593-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Dkt # 15
Dec 20, 2005
OPINION AND ORDER : On December 9, 2005 the court gave notice to the parties of its proposal to close 3:05cv720 as an identical case to 3:05cv668. Ten days has passed without objection so the court now orders 3:05cv720 closed. This order has no impa ct on the legal rights of any party involved.. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 12/20/05. Associated Cases: 3:05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM-CAN,3:05 -cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00536-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00538-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-0059 3-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00652-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00653-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00664-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00665-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00666-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00667-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00668-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00720-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Dkt # 46
Dec 14, 2006
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's objection to the Magistrate Judge's ruling 369 is SUSTAINED IN PART and the Defendants' motion to compel 306 is GRANTED IN PART.. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 12/14/06. Associated Cases: 3: 05-md-00527-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00390-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00528-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00529-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00530-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00531-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00532-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00533-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00534-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00535-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00537-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00 538-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00539-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00540-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00541-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00542-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00593-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00595-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00596-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00597-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00598-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00599-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00600-RLM- CAN,3:05-cv-00601-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00652-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00664-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00666-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00667-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00668-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00720-RLM-CAN,3:05-cv-00796-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00209-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00269-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00337-RLM,3:06-cv-00393-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00428-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00429-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00801-RLM-CAN,3:06-cv-00802-RLM-CAN(sdf, )
Dkt # 204
May 7, 2018
Docket Entry
Dkt # 205
Apr 26, 2019
Docket Entry

Newer docket entries may be available. Subscribe to access new filings

Unlock instant access to this case

Download every filing.
Automated case monitoring.
Email alerts for new docket activity.

Purchase Now