Subscribe Now for Instant Access
View the full docket, download filings, and get automated alerts for new case activity.
Explore Plans
County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corporation, et al., No. 1:13-cv-05569 (S.D.N.Y.)
Case Title: County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corporation, et al.
Case Type: Civil Case
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Index Number(s): 1:2013cv5569, 1:13-cv-05569, 1:13-cv-05569-NRB
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti-Trust
Judge: Naomi Reice Buchwald
Case Opened: August 9, 2013
Docket Entries
Date Filed Dkt # Entry Text
Jul 23, 2013 RECEIPT number #CAE200053992 $400.00 fbo County of Sacramento by N E Nishimura on 7/23/2013. (Michel, G) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/9/2013.]
Document
Jul 23, 2013 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by County of Sacramento. Attorney Nishimura, Nanci E. ADDED. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nishimura, Nanci) Modified on 7/23/2013 (Michel, G). [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/9/2013.] (Entered: 07/23/2013)
Document
Jul 23, 2013 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ ltd., Barclays Bank plc, Citibank, N.A., Citigroup, Inc., Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, HBOS plc, HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Holdings plc, JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Lloyds Banking Group plc, Portigon AG, Royal Bank of Canada, Societe Generale, S.A., The Norinchukin Bank, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, UBS AG, Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nanci E. Nishimura* *840 Malcolm Road* *Suite 200* *Burlingame, CA 94010*. (Michel, G) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/9/2013.] (Entered: 07/23/2013)
Document
Jul 23, 2013 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference SET for 12/12/2013 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order, # 2 Consent Form, # 3 VDRP) (Michel, G) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/9/2013.] (Entered: 07/23/2013)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:11-md-02262-NRB. (sjo)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 CONSOLIDATED MDL CASE: Create association to 1:11-md-02262-NRB. (sjo)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. (sjo)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 Case Designated ECF. (sjo)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 NOTE TO OUT OF STATE ATTORNEYS: Please visit the Court's website at http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov for information regarding admission to the S.D.N.Y. Bar and the CM/ECF Rules & Filing Instructions. (sjo)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 5 MDL TRANSFER ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to Southern District of New York re: MDL No. 2262.(Waggoner, D) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/9/2013.] (Entered: 08/09/2013)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 6 MDL TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of California Eastern; Case Number: 2:13-cv-01476. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received. (sjo) (Entered: 08/09/2013)
Document
Aug 9, 2013 7 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (Entered: 08/12/2013)
Document
Aug 13, 2013 8 ORDER: This case was previously designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the "Pilot Project), it is hereby ORDERED that designation is hereby vacated, and the Clerk of Court shall remove the COMPLEX-CSMGMT flag. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 8/13/2013) (ft) Modified on 8/13/2013 (ft). (Entered: 08/13/2013)
Document
Aug 23, 2013 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying (296) Motion for Reconsideration; denying (327) Motion for Leave to File Document; denying (330) Motion for Leave to File Document; granting in part and denying in part (333) Motion to Amend/Correct ; denying (341) Motion for Leave to File Document in case 1:11-md-02262-NRB. For the reasons stated above, the exchange-based plaintiffs' motion for interlocutory appeal is denied; the OTC, bondholder, and exchange-based plaintiffs' motions to add allegations with respect to antitrust are denied; the exchange-based plaintiffs' motion to add allegations with respect to trader-based manipulation is denied; BT-MU, Credit Suisse, and Norinchukin's motion for reconsideration is denied without prejudice to a similar motion being filed by defendants that addresses the issues raised herein; and, the OTC plaintiffs motion for leave to reassert their unjust enrichment claim and to add a claim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is granted. By September 10, 2013, the OTC plaintiffs and the exchange-based plaintiffs shall each file a second amended complaint that conforms with the rulings herein. If defendants believe that the new complaints are inconsistent with our rulings, they shall inform us by September 20, 2013. Further, if defendants wish to file a motion for reconsideration on grounds similar to those asserted in BT-MUs, Credit Suisse's, and Norinchukin's motion and which addresses the issues we have raised, they must file such a motion by September 20, 2013. Finally, if defendants intend to move for reconsideration of the March 29 Order on statute of limitations grounds or to make a renewed motion to dismiss with regard to "Period 2" claims, they must seek leave to file such a motion by September 20, 2013. This Memorandum and Order resolves docket entry nos. 296, 316, 327, 330, 333, and 341. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 8/23/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(ft) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
Document
Sep 18, 2013 10 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from William Christopher Carmody dated September 18, 2013. Document filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(Ard, Seth) (Entered: 09/18/2013)
Document
Sep 30, 2013 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from William Christopher Carmody dated September 30, 2013 re: repleading antitrust claim. Document filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(Ard, Seth) (Entered: 09/30/2013)
Document
Oct 4, 2013 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Christopher Lovell dated October 4, 2013 re: Reply to Defendants' September 24, 2013 letter from Robert F. Wise to the Court. Document filed by FTC Capital GMBH.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(Lovell, Christopher) (Entered: 10/04/2013)
Document
Oct 8, 2013 13 MOTION for Alanna C. Rutherford to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Bank, PLC, Barclays Capital, Inc., Barclays PLC, BARCLAY'S BANK PLC, Barclays Bank Plc,, Barklays Bank Plc, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Bank Plc., Barclays Capital Inc., Barclays U.S. Funding LLC, Barclays Bank plc.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(Rutherford, Alanna) (Entered: 10/08/2013)
Document
Oct 8, 2013 14 MOTION for James B. Meadows to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Bank, PLC, Barclays Capital, Inc., Barclays PLC, BARCLAY'S BANK PLC, Barclays Bank Plc,, Barklays Bank Plc, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Bank Plc., Barclays Capital Inc., Barclays U.S. Funding LLC, Barclays Bank plc.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(Meadows, James) (Entered: 10/08/2013)
Document
Oct 9, 2013 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This Memorandum and Order is addressed to applications pending before the Court. First, defendants' request for leave to file their Renewed Motion to Dismiss the Exchange-Based Plaintiffs' Period 2 CEA Claims is granted. Second, a decision on the permissible content of the Second Consolidated Amended Complaints is stayed until the resolution of the current motions addressed to the complaints. The operative complaints will then be denominated the Third Consolidated Amended Complaints. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 10/8/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.(ft) (Entered: 10/09/2013)
Document

This is a partial docket sheet. Subscribers can access the full docket and download PDF filings.

Subscribe now for instant access

PACER Links

PacerDash lets you track and monitor dockes without the complexity and cost of accessing PACER directly. If you have an existing PACER subscription you can access this docket using the U.S. Court's CM/ECF system.

Access this docket on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system

News Links

Search for this case: County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corporation, et al., No. 1:13-cv-05569 (S.D.N.Y.)

[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]

© PacerMonkey LLC Legal